When dealing with Muslim leaders, Washington should borrow a page from Ronald Reagan’s Soviet playbook: Trust, but verify. Many aim to deceive us, court evidence shows.
It’s now believed that several leaders of the Muslim establishment in America last decade conspired to infiltrate the U.S. political system, change Middle East policy and gradually Islamize America. At the same time, they hatched a plot to fund overseas terrorists.
Of course, they couldn’t do this out in the open. So they set up benign-sounding nonprofits and charities to “camouflage” their traitorous activities, say U.S. prosecutors who cite wiretap transcripts and other documents uncovered in a criminal probe of the Holy Land Foundation, the largest Muslim charity in America.
During a secret meeting at a Philadelphia hotel, the charity’s president and other prominent Muslim leaders were recorded allegedly plotting ways to disguise payments to Hamas terrorists as charity.
“I swear by Allah that war is deception,” said Shukri Abu-Baker, now on trial in the federal terror-funding case. “We are fighting our enemy with a kind heart. . . . Deceive, camouflage, pretend that you’re leaving while you’re walking that way. Deceive your enemy.”
Another participant at the Hamas summit was the founder of the Council on American Islamic-Relations, or CAIR, the largest Muslim civil-rights group in the country and an unindicted co-conspirator in the terror-funding case.
Adding to Abu-Baker’s point, Omar Ahmad compared the deception needed to fool the infidels with the head fake in basketball. “He makes a player believe that he is doing this while he does something else,” Ahmad said. “I agree with you. . . . Politics is a completion of war.”
The Islamist head fake has worked all too well over the past decade. Blind acceptance and validation of Muslim leaders with questionable loyalties hardly missed a beat in Washington even after 9/11.
Many were invited to the White House and Congress. The head of the FBI spoke at their conferences, calling them “mainstream” and “moderate.” Many naive officials still confer legitimacy on them.
But what Muslim leaders tell us and what they tell Muslim audiences are often two entirely different things. The deception is astonishing.
They’ve really played us for suckers.
Sunday, September 30, 2007
"The deception is astonishing. They've really played us for suckers" IBD- On Islamic-Head Faking The Infidel
Has the candidates’ personal faith become too big an issue in the presidential race?
"Questions about that are very legitimate.... And it's also appropriate for me at certain points in the conversation to say, look, that's sort of a private matter between me and my Creator.... But I think the number one issue people should make [in the] selection of the President of the United States is, 'Will this person carry on in the Judeo Christian principled tradition that has made this nation the greatest experiment in the history of mankind?'"
It doesn't seem like a Muslim candidate would do very well, according to that standard.
"I admire the Islam. There's a lot of good principles in it. I think one of the great tragedies of the 21st century is that these forces of evil have perverted what's basically an honorable religion. But, no, I just have to say in all candor that since this nation was founded primarily on Christian principles.... personally, I prefer someone who I know who has a solid grounding in my faith. But that doesn't mean that I'm sure that someone who is Muslim would not make a good president. I don't say that we would rule out under any circumstances someone of a different faith. I just would--I just feel that that's an important part of our qualifications to lead."
The Daily News immediately ran to a "Muslim rights group" leader, Ibrahim Hooper, who characteristically "ripped the Arizona Republican's remarks."
The Missing Context, which the Daily News had no interest in googling, is that the Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR, is an unindicted co-conspirator in the terror-support trial of five officers of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development.IPT
CAIR is part of an Islamic conspiracy: INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
"to infiltrate the U.S. political system, change Middle East policy and gradually Islamize America. At the same time, they hatched a plot to fund overseas terrorists."
IBrahim Hooper is the go-to-guy for the Islamic front group CAIR. His job is to head fake the infidel. According to the Investor's Business Daily this is how the Islamic front groups head fake the infidel:
"During a secret meeting at a Philadelphia hotel, the charity's president and other prominent Muslim leaders were recorded allegedly plotting ways to disguise payments to Hamas terrorists as charity.
"I swear by Allah that war is deception," said Shukri Abu-Baker, now on trial in the federal terror-funding case. "We are fighting our enemy with a kind heart. . . . Deceive, camouflage, pretend that you're leaving while you're walking that way. Deceive your enemy."
Another participant at the Hamas summit was the founder of the Council on American Islamic-Relations, or CAIR, the largest Muslim civil-rights group in the country and an unindicted co-conspirator in the terror-funding case.
Adding to Abu-Baker's point, Omar Ahmad compared the deception needed to fool the infidels with the head fake in basketball. "He makes a player believe that he is doing this while he does something else," Ahmad said. "I agree with you. . . . Politics is a completion of war."
In that role, Hooper is quick to condemn U.S. law enforcement investigations into alleged terrorist financiers and supporters in America as part of a general war on Islam or as the product of "the pro-Israeli lobby."
In contrast, he bristles at questions concerning CAIR's attitude toward Palestinian terrorism, most notably by Hamas. Hooper calls such questions a "game" and declared, "We're not in the business of condemning."
He has criticized references to "Islamist" terrorism in the 9/11 Commission report and portrayed the word "Wahhabism" is "of those terms which is invented to scare people about Muslim bogeymen. It's just all part of the extremely powerful right wing and their agenda right now to demonize Saudi Arabia and demonize anything associated with Saudi Arabia."
The list of similar dissembling and apologies for extremism is long. A series of recent appearances on MSNBC's "Tucker" program with Tucker Carlson exhibits it more clearly.
On July 26, 2007, Hooper justifies a lawsuit targeting unknown travelers who reported suspicious behavior among the "flying imams" that led to their removal from a 2006 US Airways flight. The "John Doe" passengers later were dropped from the case following a backlash of criticism.
On June 28, 2007, Hooper explains how surprisingly high poll numbers showing support for Osama bin Laden in parts of the Muslim world has nothing to do with bin Laden.
On May 23, 2007, Hooper tries to minimize a Pew survey showing more than 25 percent of American Muslims under age 30 justify suicide bombings and in which more than half of all respondents doubt Muslims were involved in the 9/11 attacks.IPT
Saturday, September 29, 2007
Friday, September 28, 2007
Senior al-Qaida Orc VIP Abu Nasr al-Tunisi Outside Air Locker Today---Killer of Pfc. Kristian Menchaca and Pfc. Thomas Tucker.
Abu Nasr al-Tunisi
and two other Al Q’aeda minions were separated from this air locker by a U.S. Air Force F-16CJ Fighting Falcon. The F-16, dropped dropped two laser guided 500 lb Joint Direct Attack Munition GBU-12 bombs, destroyed the terrorist safe house where meeting took place near Al Nussayyib, Iraq Sept. 25. The body of Tunisi was ID'ed by a member of the meeting who lhad left the safehouse minutes before the building exploded. The luckiest Orc in the world ran into a cordon surrounding the area and was captured. A hand written note thought to belong to Tunisi was discovered by the evidence team investigating the site. The note attests to the success of the surge against the Orcs operating inside Iraq. The note stated: 'I am surrounded....communications are cut off and I am desperate for your help.' Tunisi was part of the top tier leadership and his death leaves a giant hole in their structure especially if El Numero Uno in Iraq is killed or captured.
BG Anderson said Tunisi was involved in bringing sucide jihad jockey and the capture of American soldiers. Although, BG Anderson did not specify exactly what soldiers Tunisi captured extrapolating from the timeline it is very possible that it was Pfc. Kristian Menchaca and Pfc. Thomas Tucker.
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Much has been made in the Western press of Hezballah's benign social services function in Lebanon, of the hospitals and schools it has built. Almost no notice however has been paid to the large numbers of these hospitals and schools which were built over its military bunkers and rocket launching sites.
This was perhaps both the most cynical and barbaric disregard for innocent civilian lives of all of Hezballah's and Iran's strategic choices. It was also the most successful. It was predicated not on its knowledge of its enemy (Israel) but its true genius lay in its knowledge of the press. The calculus was simple: launch a rocket from within a civilian population; if you kill Jews that's a victory. If the Jews hit back and in so doing kill Lebanese civilians, that's a victory. If they don't hit back because they're afraid to hit civilians, that's a victory. Now repeat the process until you kill so many Jews they have to hit back and in so doing kill more Lebanese civilians. That's the ultimate victory, because they know that in striking just those chords exactly what music the press will play. The awful truth, which the Western Press was manipulated to ignore or downplay, was that Iran, through its terrorist operational arm Hezballah, had invaded Lebanon from within. Hezballah did not protect Lebanon, they occupied it and they used those Hezballah occupied territories to launch Iran's offensive in response to the West's ultimatum to cease development of nuclear weapons.
What they failed to gain militarily they accomplished through the manipulation of the Western Media which were their willing dupes and through the ineptitude and weakness, if not down right appeasement of the political leadership of the International community which has all but guaranteed that this war will be but round one.
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
In old Mexico, a gracious host greeting visitors to his home, regardless how humble, would throw wide the doors and exclaim, Welcome, please do come in, and where Americans would say "Make yourself home" proud Mexicans say "Mi casa es su casa" my house is your house. Mexican President Felipe Calderon, the leader of a dead beat government, unable, unwilling, and too grossly incompetent to provide for its' own people is now a sad addict living off the pitiful weekly paycheck remittances sent home by the survivors of the trek to El Norte. El President Felipe Calderon is fighting mad and fearful of losing the
"estimated $25 billion in remittances from Mexican citizens living and working here illegally, and at least another $25 billion generated by the illegal drug trade across our southern border."
Calderon solution:'take over the USA--Your country is Now My Country' says El Presidente's recent State of the Nation address:
"I have said that Mexico does not stop at its border, that wherever there is a Mexican, there is Mexico."
"And, for this reason, the government action on behalf of our countrymen is guided by principles, for the defense and protection of their rights."
So why is Mexican President Felipe Calderon growing a set of cojones? Why is protecting Mexican rights by violating American sovereignty? Why is he acting the part of the concerned hero for los abandonados, the abandoned ones, whose bodies litter the counties of our Southwest--bodies found with no ID and buried at county expense with a cryptic note attesting no more than date found, place found and summarily added to the Tomb of the Unknown Mexican Alien.
So much concerned for the peons that his policies of incompetence, corruption and shameful poverty have forced them North to work in the factories of America. As long as their remittances were flowing home the Calderon government did not give a hoot in hell about their condition. Just send the cash home. Now,however, we have a different story with security increased and on the watch for Satanic Orcs seeking to blow another hole in America
Calderon's sweet deal is coming to an end. Cash from peons and drug dealers for a government that is rapidly falling apart from law enforcement here and Unknown Orc pressures in Mexico.
TARGET: MEXICOMore global guerrilla activity in Mexico. Six new attacks by an unknown guerrilla group (an earlier claim by a leftist group was likely a false front) destroyed five PEMEX natural gas pipelines (likely through a timed detonation). 12,000 people were evacuated due to fire risk. This follows on the heals of the July pipeline attack that disrupted operations at 1,200 companies (including Honda, Nissan, and Kelloggs). If the earlier pattern of embedded timer-triggered explosives holds, there will be more explosions next week. Is this the start of the "Breaking Mexico" scenario? The sophistication of the earlier attack (given that it targeted critical valves -- systempunkts) and the ability to repeat the assault (so far, nobody has been caught) indicates that it has the potential. Global Guerrilla
Calderon words are so much posturing and hot air. He is worried about the cash flow South getting cut off. And this has already started:
Earlier this month the Migration Policy Institute reported migrant remittances to Mexico has stagnated during the first half of 2007.
In 2006, Mexico reported an estimated $25.5 billion in remittances. And between 2003 and 2006 migrant remittances to Mexico grew on average 19.1 percent annually.
In the first quarter of 2007 remittances grew by just 0.6 percent, and many Mexican states saw significant declines, including Baja California, Guanajuato, Puebla, Yucatan and Baja California del Sur. Link
Sunday, September 23, 2007
The Orc King Is On His Way To Ground Zero With "Homage For the Brave 19"--A Sea Of Red, White and Blue Bodies Are Needed To Block His Path
Kevin McCullough has a plan to create a human chain at Ground Zero.
"Ahmadinejad is responsible for many, if not most of the blown up American bodies in Iraq from Iranian made IEDs. His revolutionary guard troops, several of whom were captured in the recent surge, have violated Iraqi sovereignty so that this mad man could fight a proxy war with us. He is pledging to wipe Israel, America, and Britain off the maps - should he ever get the necessary nuclear power to do so. And he is lying, has lied, and is intending to continue to lie about the progress of his nuclear program.
It's for all these reasons and a dozen more that he should not be allowed to set foot in our nation. Yet there is not much neither you nor I can do about that.
But we CAN physically prevent him from getting near ground zero - which at 7:08pm Saturday evening is still on his schedule at 10am Monday morning.
My idea on-air was 2700 bodies between him and the site. We lost that many in that place that fateful morning six years ago.
Saturday, September 22, 2007
Yesterday, the Pope came out slugging with hard lefts and rights After a disappointing first round last year when the Pope quoted a Byzantine emperor who linked Islam to violence. After riots, calls for his death and the murder of a nun shot in the back by Orcs the pope said he was sorry Muslims had misunderstood his words.
This time the pope has come out looking to reclaim his title as Defender of the Faith. Not mincing words the Pope attacked Muslim nations who persecute Christians and force them to live as second-class citizens under Shariah Islamic Law. Not stopping there the Pope also defended the rights of Muslims to convert to Christianity. Muslims are not allowed to convert and those who do so are murdered under 7th century Islamic law.
In a direct reference to Orcs running amuck the Pope stated:
"Terrorism is a serious problem whose perpetrators often claim to act in God's name and harbor an inexcusable contempt for human life. Society naturally has a right to defend itself, but this right must be exercised with complete respect for moral and legal norms, including the choice of ends and means. In democratic systems, the use of force in a manner contrary to the principles of a constitutional State can never be justified. Indeed, how can we claim to protect democracy if we threaten its very foundations? Consequently, it is necessary both to keep careful watch over the security of civil society and its citizens while at the same time safeguarding the inalienable rights of all.
Terrorism needs to be fought with determination and effectiveness, mindful that if the mystery of evil is widespread today, the solidarity of mankind in goodness is an even more pervasive mystery.
Friday, September 21, 2007
Apparently, the definition of "is" still needs refinement:
French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner brave words, “We must prepare for the worst. The worst, sir, is war.”, like running with the shitty end of a stick must be fully understood and appreciated before picking up. "
The Dissident Frogman reminds all thick headed, naive, overly enthusiastic Yankee running puppies that there are strong reasons why jokes about French tanks coming equipped with transmission gears of one forward and 15 reverse still exist today . Ay Caramba!
"I really like the Americans. They're a bunch of incredibly decent people with an impressive record of achievements to prove it(5) but I do have to tell them something, from a friend to a friend: giving people the benefit of the doubt, and always looking for the best in them is a great quality, and one that honors your character as a nation. But when dealing with the corrupt ruling class of Old Europe in general and France in particular, it will get you nowhere, fast: Backstabbing is more than a national sport here; it's a way of life and politics. And they love to hate you."
Observation: Sarkozy adopted part of the National Front's aggressive public security rhetoric, and managed to steal a great deal of their votes, saving the country from the 2002 presidential elections blunder that saw the far-right making it to the second turn, and killing Le Pen's party for (at least) the next decade in the same move. So far, the aggressive rhetoric on security has been just that: rhetoric.
Gut feeling: far from being the disruptive young "Reaganite" newcomer who will shake the old dusty French political establishment and "save" the country from itself, Sarkozy was in fact said establishment's smart bomb to bust the old disruptive candidate (National Front's Le Pen) who had all these neo-aristocrats shaking in their boots when the voters hoisted him against the no-less odious Chirac. It worked, and French politicians from all sides will keep sleeping and eating while inbreeding vigorously; and nothing will change.
Finally, even if we admit that I'm wrong, and that France took a 180° turn three months ago, after three decades of particularly vicious anti-Americanism(6), are we sure we want them back anywhere near the battlefield?"
Ok. So file this under Lesson Learned.
Front Page Magazine
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Excuse me but what part of NO don't you understand?
The Orc King's rap sheet:
Steven Emerson executive director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism (investigativeproject.org), the nation's largest archival intelligence center on Islamic terrorist activities.
* The al Qaeda-Iran relationship began in late 1991 or early 1992 when Iranian agents met with al Qaeda leaders in Sudan and informally agreed to provide mutual support for attacks against Israel and the United States.
* Not long after this initial meeting, al Qaeda operatives and trainers went to Iran, where they received training in explosives.
* After al Qaeda was forced to relocate from Sudan to Afghanistan, Iranian agents continued to meet with al Qaeda leadership figures. Iranian officials often accommodated al Qaeda operatives by not stamping their passports -facilitating covert travel through Iran.
* The 9/11 Commission Report notes that eight to 10 of the 9/11 hijackers traveled through Iran between October 2000 and February 2001.
* After the liberation of Afghanistan, several top al Qaeda figures took refuge in Iran.
Iran's various terror puppets have also taken many other American lives:
* Hezbollah was founded in 1982 in the Bekaa Valley by Lebanese Shiite clerics educated in Iran. The IRGC established training camps in Lebanon where Hezbollah recruits trained alongside members of other national and transnational terrorist organizations. Hezbollah members train in Iran on IRGC bases and facilities.
* Before 9/11, Hezbollah was responsible for more American deaths than any other terrorist group, having carried out the deadly 1983 attack on the Marine barracks in Beirut, which killed 200 American servicemen.
* Saudi Hezbollah, which also receives Iranian support, executed a truck bombing at the Khobar Towers housing complex in Saudi Arabia that killed 19 Americans in 1996.
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
Ginger Gilbert, the widow of Air Force Pilot Troy Gilbert read the Dead Brains Media their rights after they ran with Orc film coverage of his body, the crash site of the F-16 and his ID card. Mrs. Gilbert accused the Dead Brains Media of helping Orcs erode public support for the war.
Ginger Gilbert, widow of Air Force Maj. Troy Gilbert, killed in his jet in Iraq.
The Arizona Republic
Sept. 18, 2007 04:02 PM
Ginger Gilbert, making her first public comments since the video emerged last week, said Tuesday that she couldn't remain silent after watching media coverage of a "disturbing video" of the corpse, identification card and crash site of her husband, Maj. Troy Gilbert.
"When media chooses to use Troy's plane crash as a political catalyst to generate anti-war sentiment, it only serves to degrade the moral integrity my husband possessed and the morale of those still selflessly serving," Gilbert said at news conference at Glendale's Falcon Dunes Golf Course, across from Luke.
"Every time the press lends credibility and significance to terrorist propaganda clearly designed to erode public support or questions the validity of our brave soldiers' selfless acts of service and the war itself," she added, "it only serves to damage our country from within its own borders and embolden those who would do us harm."
Flanked by friends and family members clasping hands, Gilbert thanked Arizonans, the Air Force and her Desert Springs Community Church in Litchfield Park for serving as a "shield of protection for my family's welfare and betterment over the last 10 months."
Troy Gilbert, 34, a father of five, was killed Nov. 27, 2006, when his F-16 crashed about 20 miles northwest of Baghdad. Officials concluded that Gilbert crashed because he was so focused on saving friendly troops from attacking insurgents that he flew too low.
Luke officials, who helped plan the news conference at the request of Gilbert's widow, have declined to comment on the video, referring all questions to the Defense Department.
Capt. Miki Gilloon, Luke's chief spokeswoman, stressed that Gilbert's statement was personal and did not reflect the position of the Glendale base.
"We're here to support her the best we can to make sure she conveys her statement to the media," Gilloon said.
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
"We didn't want this to become more than it is,":Mayor Deliberately Delayed Release Of Dearborn Muslim Jihad Story
"We didn't want this to become more than it is," O'Reilly said. "There are certain things that the media latches onto, and this would have turned into a story about terrorism. That's not the kind of tone we want to set."
More than it is! Mayor Jack O'Reilly believes that Zorkot's website "Welcome to the Land of Resistance and Freedom" is what? Jihad against city park squirrels!
"From a page of photographs at zorkot.org, here’s the first one, uploaded on September 8, 2007:"
Members of the Brain Dead Media continue to be slow on the up take of his story, although we did find have one news story from FREEP.com powered by the Detroit Free Press. Nira Warikoo writes a story worthy of O J's lawyers. So you have a jihad web site, a loaded AK-47, a 26 year old Muslim, dressed in basic black, war paint on his face, driving a black SUV, running around in Hemlock City Park and Nira wants to know:
The Start of My Personal Jihad (in the US)
Owner: Gallery Administrator
"Were those the actions of a confused young man or those of a potential terrorist with ill intentions?"
Ill Intentions?--Not Murderous Mayhem?
Confusion? Not the deliberate start of "my personal jihad"
The steadfast Dearborn Mayor: "Was he really dangerous or was he acting out some fantasy? We don't know," O'Reilly said.
This is too Rich! Acting out some fantasy. Against the squirrels, no doubt, for stealing his nuts.
"His parents ... have said he's a young man who's just confused right now," O'Reilly said.
Grades. College. PRESSURE!!!
"Zorkot, a third-year student at Wayne State University's medical school, may have been going through difficulties at school and at Providence Hospital in Southfield, O'Reilly said."
Grades and College will do that to you every single time. Turn an average Joe Blow into Spiderman or a Jihad Jockey ready to celebrate 9/11.
Nice of the mayor to take such a personal interest in one of Dearborn's finest.
Read this from:
New Age Citizen:
Just consider that the prime minister and wife of the emir of Qatar recently donated $1.5 million towards a $5 million dollar American-Arab Center for Civil and Human Rights that just broke ground the other day in Dearborn. You can read the entire article here:
Supporters acknowledged at future site of rights center
By Tim Powers, Press & Guide Newspapers
PUBLISHED: September 16, 2007
And who else was there for the ground breaking? Just about every major important political figure for the State of Michigan:
Monday, September 17, 2007
French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said on Sunday his country must prepare for the possibility of war against Iran over its nuclear programme, but he did not believe any such action was imminent.
Seeking to ratchet up the pressure on Iran, Kouchner also told RTL radio and LCI television that the world's major powers should use further sanctions to show they were serious about stopping Tehran getting atom bombs, and said France had asked French firms not to bid for tenders in the Islamic Republic.
"We must prepare for the worst," Kouchner said in an interview, adding: "The worst, sir, is war."
Asked about the preparations, he said it was normal to prepare for various eventualities.
"We are preparing ourselves by trying to put together plans that are the chiefs of staff's prerogative (but) that is not about to happen tomorrow," he added.
Tehran insists it only wants to master nuclear technology to produce electricity, but it has yet to comply with repeated U.N. demands that it suspend uranium enrichment and other sensitive work that could potentially be used in producing weapons.
Kouchner's comments follow a similarly hawkish statement by French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who said last month in his first major foreign policy speech since taking office that a diplomatic push by the world's powers was the only alternative to "an Iranian bomb or the bombing of Iran".
Sunday, September 16, 2007
Muslim Brotherhood's Plans To Destroy America from Within:"Six years after 9/11, we're still asleep. Islamic radicals have declared war on us"
This "explanatory memorandum," as it's titled, outlines the "strategic goal" for the North American operation of the extremist Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan). Here's the key paragraph:
The process of settlement [of Islam in the United States] is a "Civilization-Jihadist" process with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" their miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim's destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who choose to slack.
The entire 18-page platform outlines a plan for the long haul. It prescribes the Muslim Brotherhood's comprehensive plan to set down roots in civil society. It begins by both founding and taking control of American Muslim organizations, for the sake of unifying and educating the U.S. Muslim community – this to prepare it for the establishment of a global Islamic state governed by sharia.
It sounds like a conspiracy theory out of a bad Hollywood movie – but it's real. Husain Haqqani, head of Boston University's Center for International Relations and a former Islamic radical, confirms that the Brotherhood "has run most significant Muslim organizations in the U.S." as part of the plan outlined in the strategy paper.
The HLF trial is exposing for the first time how the international Muslim Brotherhood – whose Palestinian division is Hamas – operates as a self-conscious revolutionary vanguard in the United States. The court documents indicate that many leading Muslim-American organizations – including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Muslim American Society – are an integral part of the Brotherhood's efforts to wage jihad against America by nonviolent means.
The Muslim Brotherhood is an affiliation of at least 70 Islamist organizations around the world, all tracing their heritage to the original cell, founded in Egypt in 1928. Its credo: "Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Quran is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope." Sayyid Qutb, hanged by the Egyptian government in 1966 as a revolutionary, remains its ideological godfather. His best-known work, Milestones, calls for Muslims to wage violent holy war until Islamic law governs the entire world.
According to a 2004 Chicago Tribune investigation, establishing the Brotherhood in the United States has been a 40-year project that has worked mostly underground – even beneath the notice of many Muslims. Richard Clarke, the former top U.S. national security official, told the Senate in 2003 that the Muslim Brotherhood is the common thread linking terrorist fundraising schemes in the United States – which likely explains why so many mainstream American Muslim organizations were named by the feds as "unindicted co-conspirators" in the HLF trial.
Is this just alarmist paranoia? Not at all.
This matters because high-profile organizations with roots explicitly in the Muslim Brotherhood have successfully established themselves in a paramount position to define Islam in America according to a radical politicized model. And they've done so without the American public having the slightest idea about their real agenda. Indeed, the Bush administration is unwittingly helping the Islamist cause by including their leaders in public events, thus conferring them legitimacy. On Labor Day weekend, the same Department of Justice that's presenting evidence of the ISNA's involvement with radical Islam at the Dallas trial sponsored a booth at – wait for it – ISNA's national convention in suburban Chicago.
Look, no rational person believes America is going to exchange the Constitution for a caliphate. Rational people aren't the point. As the London subway bombings showed, even a tiny cell of committed radicals can kill a lot of people. Mustafa Saied, an American Muslim who left the Brotherhood, told the Tribune that he worried about the radicalism the Brotherhood inculcated in its membership here. "With the extreme element," he said, "you never know when that ticking time bomb will go off."
As long as they commit no crimes, CAIR, ISNA and the other Brotherhood-related groups have the right to advocate for their beliefs. But they don't have the right to escape critical scrutiny, and they deserve informed opposition. Courageous Muslims like Dr. Zuhdi Jasser of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy are sounding the alarm about radical Islam's stealth takeover of U.S. Muslim institutions. Why are the news media ignoring this? Fear of being called Islamophobic?
This has got to stop. Six years after 9/11, we're still asleep. Islamic radicals have declared war on us – and some are fighting here in what looks like a fifth column. Read their strategy document. It's there in black and white, for those with eyes to see.
Saturday, September 15, 2007
Democrats Explain:" if you do believe in appeasement, pacifism, globalism your wish for defeat is no evil or traitorous urge." It's Logical.
Scott Johnson's alert to Gelernter's "Defeat at Any Price" Why Petraeus's testimony was a nightmare for the Democrats, goes right to the heart of a question of why is it that Democrats are so invested in our defeat in Iraq to the point of aiding and abetting the enemy. The usual answers Democrats are suffering from BDS and/or they are planning to trade defeat in Iraq for a win at the election, however true, just never hit bed rock as a complete answer. Think of it for a second, as deranged as Democrats can get--you mean to tell me that they are willing to strike a deal with the Devil in return for success at the polls over the bodies of our American dead and the Iraqi holocaust to follow after retreat. Insane. Ok. So what part of Yes don't you understand, Jack Burton. Read Professor Gelernter essay and there is yet another alternative view: the Democrats' deep-seated belief in appeasement, pacifism, and globalism.
To prepare for General David Petraeus's long-awaited testimony on Iraq to Congress last week, the liberal pressure group MoveOn.org wrote itself into the history books with an anti-Petraeus ad so repulsive it ranked with Lyndon Johnson's infamous 1964 TV spot in the campaign against Barry Goldwater: A little girl picking flowers dissolved into a mushroom cloud, and then the screen went black. (Evidently by voting for Goldwater, you expressed your support for nuclear holocaust.) But gleeful Republicans who are certain that MoveOn has finally tipped its hand and shown America what the left is all about should remember that Johnson won that election, in a landslide. Because MoveOn headlined its ugly ad with an ugly rhyme ("General Betray Us"), it will stick in the public mind. But it is just possible that the public will invite MoveOn to take their ad and ShoveIt.
Democrats at the hearings themselves found it impossible to look this capable, thoughtful, distinguished man in the face and endorse the MoveOn ad. But don't get them wrong: Leading Dems had dumped on Petraeus often in the past, and were dumping furiously in preparation for the hearings. Petraeus is guilty of "carefully manipulating the statistics," Senator Dick Durbin announced; in fact the general has "made a number of statements over the years that have not proven to be factual" (in strict contradistinction to Majority Leader Harry Reid), said Majority Leader Harry Reid. Barbara Boxer and Joe Biden plunged their knives in also.
The Democrats were scared for a reason. They worried that Petraeus would impress the country as dispassionate and serious--which he did. He called Bush's troop surge no unqualified success, said that much work remains--but that Iraq has turned a corner; has achieved tangible, important results in its fight against terrorism and inter-sect violence since the surge began. It was a Democratic nightmare.
America's ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker, had the harder job of reporting on political progress. He said, too, that much work remained; Iraq's political health is bad in some ways, improving in others. But one fact towers above the rest like the ghost of the World Trade Center: If we stay put until the patient is stable, we face a tough job; if we panic and run, we face catastrophe.
Again this message was bad news for leading Democrats. But their reaction was just what it should've been, given that President Bush is the enemy--and, like the man said, politics ain't beanbag. Surely it's only natural for leading Democrats in Congress and the presidential campaign, and their vicious lap dogs on the web, to hope for the president's policies to fail.
Americans are so accustomed (or inured) to this attitude that they rarely step back and ask, What the hell is going on here?
The issue isn't tactics--doesn't concern the draw-down that the administration has forecast and General Petraeus has now discussed, or how this draw-down should work, or how specific such talk ought to be. The issue is deeper. It's time for Americans to ask some big questions. Do leading Democrats want America to win this war? Have they ever?
Of course not--and not because they are traitors. To leading Democrats such as Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, Al Gore and John Edwards, America would be better off if she lost. And this has been true from the start.
To rephrase the question: Why did Harry Reid announce months ago that the war was lost when it wasn't, and everyone knew it wasn't? The wish is father to the deed. He was envisioning the world of his dreams.
The Democrats' embrace of defeat is inspired by no base desire to see Americans killed or American resources wasted. But let's be honest about it, and invite the Democrats to be honest too.
Appeasement, pacifism, globalism: Those are the Big Three principles of the Democratic left. Each one has been defended by serious people; all are philosophically plausible, or at least arguable. But they are unpopular (especially the first two) with the U.S. public, and so the Democrats rarely make their views plain. We must infer their ideas from their (usually) guarded public statements.
Globalism and Euro-envy are explicit, sometimes, in Democratic pronouncements--about the sanctity of the United Nations, the importance of global conferences and "multilateralism" (except in cases like North Korea, where the president already is moving multilaterally), the superiority of the Canadian or German health care system, and so forth. The Democrats are not unpatriotic, but their patriotism is directed at a large abstract entity called The International Community or even (aping Bronze Age paganism) the Earth, not at America. Benjamin Disraeli anticipated this worldview long ago when he called Liberals the "Philosophical" and Conservatives the "National" party. Liberals are loyal to philosophical abstractions--and seek harmony with the French and Germans. Conservatives are loyal to their own nation, and seek harmony with its Founders and heroes and guiding principles.
The Democrats don't conceal their globalist ideas, but their appeasement and pacifism are positions they can only hint at.
So Democratic senator Dick Durbin had the effrontery to plead with the nation to pray for our Iraq wounded and please not to forget them--as if Republicans need Dick Durbin to remind them to honor our troops. When Democrats dwell on alleged analogies between Iraq and Vietnam, the message is clear. "Bring our troops home," says Harry Reid, and adds the incantation "responsibly"--which magically protects him from all charges of irresponsibility. ("Abolish the Constitution and sink the Navy--responsibly!") When MoveOn held a candlelight vigil over the summer to support Senate Democrats, the symbolism was plain. We light candles to remember the dead.
But if we only remember the dead and not the cause for which they died, we dishonor and make nonsense of the noblest of all sacrifices. And we mock a president who asked that "from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion--that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain." That is the issue when Americans die in combat. Do we finish the mission and invest their deaths with meaning? Or do we shrug them off, inscribe their names on some sepulchral black wall in a ditch, and walk away?
Of course if our mission in Iraq were wrong or foolish or impossible, we would be right to abandon it. But recall that Americans have fought and died in Iraq to destroy a tyranny that was underwriting terrorism, threatening the peace of its region and the world--and torturing its own people to death. Americans died to put Iraq in the hands of a government that would terrorize neither its own people nor any other nor the world at large. Their mission was noble and right.
It is incomprehensible that the administration so rarely discusses the moral side of our achievement in Iraq. No doubt it's still impossible, in today's world, to launch a major war and depose a government merely for the sake of humanity, merely to rescue a people that is being torn apart and eaten alive by its rulers, merely on principle--although it is fair to wonder, 60-odd years after the Shoah, when it will be possible. But Americanism has long held that when we are forced to fight for our interests, we ought to fight for our principles too.
It's proving a harder fight than we anticipated. We've made serious mistakes along the way. Both statements apply to most American wars. The difference today is that some leading Americans would prefer defeat to victory.
Compare today's war in Iraq with the American fight to clear the Japanese out of Guadalcanal, from September 1942 through early February '43. Obviously that was a vastly shorter stretch than our time in Iraq--but losses in the South Pacific were incomparably greater. Imagine Harry Reid's reaction to news like this: During our first landings, four Allied heavy cruisers (three American) were sunk and a fifth chased away in a battle lasting 32 minutes; nearly 1,300 Americans died. (Multicultural enthusiasts who teach our children that white men are the bane of the earth should explain why Guadalcanal's native Melanesians "were uniformly hostile to the Japanese," according to Samuel Eliot Morison, "and friendly to the Allies.")
At the start of the Guadalcanal fighting, 1,600 American Marines and GIs died on the ground in a single month. Morison writes that "mid-October marked the nadir of misery" for Americans on that rank and lethal island. But one of the most notorious episodes of the war was still to come: In November the Japanese sank the U.S. cruiser Juneau. Six hundred men drowned; another 100 clung to the wreckage--of whom 90 were eaten by sharks or went mad in the open sea without food, water, or shelter and then drowned alongside their crewmates. The 690 deaths in this one crew included the famous five Sullivan brothers.
By the start of February nearly all Japanese troops on the island had been killed, but the rest fought desperately and brutally, as they had from the start; every Japanese soldier was (in effect) a suicide bomber who preferred death to surrender. Guadalcanal was secured at last on February 9.
You might argue that World War II has nothing to do with Iraq; after all, the Japanese started the fight by attacking our fleet at Pearl Harbor. But even the Japanese never succeeded in slaughtering civilians on the U.S. mainland. And those who think that our war in Iraq has nothing to do with the 9/11 murderers, or their friends whose ultimate target is America, are living in Fantasyland.
People like to write nowadays about the courage and resolution of our troops in World War II--praise that is richly deserved. But the facts suggest that our men on the front lines in Iraq today are just as brave and resolute as our World War II troops. ("Men" meaning "males"; Army regulation AR 600-13 of 1994, confirmed by the Department of Defense, bars women from combat in ground warfare--although women can, of course, be exposed to danger and capture in staff and support jobs, to our national disgrace. Then again, why worry? Doubtless no enemy so religious, so very pious that he is willing to slaughter soldiers and civilians at random in exchange for a generous allotment of virgins in heaven, could possibly contemplate molesting a captive American female.) Victory in World War II required brave soldiers--and civilians who backed them up with a different sort of bravery, vastly easier to achieve but just as crucial in its way. It's not our soldiers (Lord knows) who have turned coward in this war; it's we who have turned defeatist. We civilians--or at any rate the Democratic leaders among us.
If you believe in appeasement, defeat in Iraq would show that we were wrong to stop talking and start fighting. If you believe in pacifism, defeat would demonstrate that war is futile even if your motives are good. If you believe in globalism, defeat would suggest that we should have acted strictly in concert with world opinion. In short, if you do believe in appeasement, pacifism, globalism (and many leading Democrats do), your wish for defeat is no evil or traitorous urge. It is merely logical.
It also, of course, contradicts traditional Americanism right down to the ground. Americanism is the set of beliefs that has always held this country together in its large embrace. Americanism calls for liberty, equality, and democracy for all mankind. And it urges this nation to promote the American Creed wherever and whenever it can--to be the shining city on a hill, the "last, best hope of earth." Ultimately, Americanism is derived from the Bible. The Bible itself has been a grand unifying force in American society, uniting Christians of many creeds from Eastern Orthodox to Unitarian, and Jews, and Bible-respecting deists like Thomas Jefferson--and many others who respect and honor the Bible whatever their own religious beliefs.
Pacifist globalism is radically at odds with Americanism. Where did this new creed come from, and where is it headed?
It was imported from Europe, where it originated during and after World War I. It hibernated in America until Vietnam--America's very own First World War, according to the left: a futile bloodbath. Reagan and, later, the Gulf war sent this European creed into hibernation once again. But Iraq is the left's chance to convert large numbers of Americans from Americanism to Euro-style pacifist globalism. If the balance should tip--if a majority or even a large minority of Americans should abandon Americanism--that would be a cultural watershed.
And it would mark the start of America's decline just as surely as World War I and its consequences marked the start of Europe's.
How did pacifist globalism, grossly unpopular in the Western world before the First World War, rise to a dominant position in contemporary Europe--and then come to threaten Americanism on our own shores?
World War I barely exists in American memory. When Americans think about it at all, they are apt to picture a violently buffoonish comic opera with men dying by the million. Which is partly true: On the western front, where Germany grappled with the Allies (led by France, Britain, and later America), the war was indeed fought with murderous irresponsibility on both sides. The nearly incomprehensible destruction (60,000 British casualties at the Somme--on the first day) has obscured the fact that Britain entered this war for almost exactly the same reason she entered World War II. Germany had smashed, splintered, and slaughtered her way into a small neighboring state that Britain had promised to protect: Belgium in World War I, Poland in World War II.
The cause was right, but the casualties were so enormous, they turned European thinking back on itself (like bending a steel beam in two, or making a U-turn in an aircraft carrier)--and it's no wonder. Pacifist globalism was a natural response to unspeakable war casualties, just as disabling mental illness was a natural response to awful childhood trauma in the Freudian worldview that once dominated Western thinking.
Pacifist globalism has nearly always been popular with intellectuals. But in 1920s and '30s Britain, it suddenly became the creed of the nation--and of Conservative prime ministers with large majorities in the House of Commons: of Stanley Baldwin (said by a colleague to be "for peace at any price") and Neville Chamberlain, his chosen successor. "Many and varied were the suggestions made" on behalf of pacifism, wrote Malcolm Muggeridge; "many and varied the enterprises launched, great the expenditure of energy and passion, enormous the area of paper covered, heartfelt the vows taken, undeniably sincere the words spoken." (Muggeridge notes that "postcards were dispatched to addresses chosen at random from German directories, stating that the writers of them were resolved in all circumstances to practice non-resistance, surprise being expressed that these communications were duly delivered.") Globalism expressed itself, meanwhile, in earnest dedication to the League of Nations--an institution that proved itself even more useless than the United Nations. An impressive feat.
Pacifist globalism was so popular it lost World War II for the tragically underprepared French and nearly lost it for the British. The British pulled themselves together and made a heroic stand, but the French will never live down (least of all in their own minds) the humiliation of being overrun by German armor in a matter of weeks; of choosing not even to defend their beloved capital city. Poland put up a stiffer fight than France in the Second World War.
America proved immune to pacifist globalism, until Vietnam. The Vietnam war was nothing like World War I, despite the implicit analogies that emerged later. At first it was run badly, but when General Creighton Abrams replaced William Westmoreland as supreme American commander in May 1968, our strategy changed dramatically. With Abrams in charge the war "was being won on the ground," wrote the historian Lewis Sorley, "even as it was being lost at the peace table and in the U.S. Congress." Americans continued to support the war effort nearly until the end. The 1972 presidential election was a referendum on Vietnam; "Come home, America!" preached the antiwar Democrat George McGovern--and lost to Richard Nixon in a landslide. Of all U.S. population segments, 18- to 24-year-old men--who were subject to the draft and manned the front lines--were consistently the war's strongest supporters. "It was not the American people which lost its stomach," wrote the British historian Paul Johnson, "it was the American leadership."
But intellectuals succeeded in squeezing Vietnam into the dreaded iron maiden of World War I. They succeeded in smearing it, in other words, as a futile, pointless massacre. The results were inevitable. In the 1970s, Americanism was in danger for the first time since the Civil War. Americans, who had always seen the distinction between just and unjust wars, were in peril of contracting the moral blindness called pacifism--and of laying in stocks of the ever-popular snake oil called globalism.
Ronald Reagan turned things around. He brought Americanism back; he repeated what John Winthrop had written in 1630 about America, the shining city on a hill. Americanism had weathered its greatest crisis since 1861. Or so it seemed.
But Iraq has made everything fresh and new for the Democratic leadership. If it can paint Iraq as another Vietnam and relive its great triumphs of the 1970s, the damage done to the American psyche might be permanent. Americans might stop believing in liberty, equality, and democracy for all mankind and retreat to the revised European version: liberty, equality, and democracy (of a sort)--for us. Instead of believing Lincoln's words--"with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in"--Americans might become self-satisfied and complacent pseudo-Europeans. Hollow men. Without Americanism, America joins the European robot republics that have no spiritual life and don't even miss it.
But it's also possible that the Democratic leadership's wish for American defeat in Iraq will make it clear to this nation (to conservatives and liberals) that today's Democratic party is no longer a responsible party of government--at least at the national level where America's security, vision, and honor are at stake.
Possibly "New Democrats" à la Tony Blair will rally round such lonely voices as Joe Lieberman's--but remember that New Labour fought its way out of the political womb and all the way to Number 10 only because of the Tories' ongoing nervous breakdown. More likely, America's political spectrum a decade or more in the future will be defined by two parties both born of today's GOP after a natural and painless mitosis. There's at least as much distance between a Rudy Giuliani and a Mike Huckabee as there ever was between JFK and Nixon, or even Adlai Stevenson and Dwight Eisenhower. Americans traditionally like their two opposing parties to differ on domestic affairs but agree on basic foreign policy--not because things are nicer that way; rather because foreign-policy arguments are good for our enemies, bad for our friends, and hugely dangerous to ourselves--especially in an age when swarms of maniac, murderous jihadists blacken the Middle East like toxic locusts.
Listen to what the Democrats are really saying. Consider what they actually want. And pray God they never get it.
(Click to enlarge) mitosis (Academy Artworks)
n. Biology., pl. -ses (-sēz).
- The process in cell division by which the nucleus divides, typically consisting of four stages, prophase, metaphase, anaphase, and telophase, and normally resulting in two new nuclei, each of which contains a complete copy of the parental chromosomes. Also called karyokinesis.
- The entire process of cell division including division of the nucleus and the cytoplasm.
[Greek mitos, warp thread + –OSIS.]mitotic mi·tot'ic (-tŏt'ĭk) adj.
mitotically mi·tot'i·cal·ly adv.
CALLER: The reason I called was to ask if you remembered when the timeline for a war depended on when the enemy surrendered.
RUSH: Uh... (laughs) Yes.
CALLER: Why is it that John Edwards and the rest of the Democrats don't understand that principle?
RUSH: Well, I think they do, but they're too far gone politically now in the investment of defeat, and their line is, "It isn't a war. It's a civil war. It's sectarian and we can't stop it, and there's nothing we can do and they're going to have to fight it out for themselves." They're being led around by their kook-fringe leftists, the anti-war movement in this country, and that's who they are proving fealty to, and nothing is going to change that. They're not interested in victory. You have to understand now, Stewart (which I'm sure you do, politically), the absolute worst thing that can happen is for this to work, and for this to succeed, and for there to be victory at the end of it. That's the worst, absolute worst thing, that can happen, especially if we make significant progress toward that prior to 2008.
Friday, September 14, 2007
The blogs are carrying the traction for the captured Dearborn Jihadi--Hezbollah Fan Boy even had his own blog with color pictures and info....
Michigan Man Caught With AK-47 In Dearborn Park Is Radical Islamist/Blogger/Doctor-in-Training (Updated)
No more items in Offline mode.to check for new items.
|Web||Results 1 - 50 of 50 for Houssein Zorkot,. (0.16 seconds)|
Did you mean: Hussein Zorkot,
|DEARBORN - Houssein Zorkot, a 26-year-old Dearborn resident, was arraigned Tuesday in 19th District Court on multiple felony charges, including carrying a ...|
|408 clicks from http://www.zorkot.org/Houssein.html. 22 clicks from http://zoulfikar.skyrock.com/4.html. 13 clicks from http://beboframe.com/FlashFrame.jsp? ...|
|This case is worse: Houssein Zorkot is an Arab, a Muslim, and an immigrant from Lebanon. How many of those facts, fairly basic to any story of a man ...|
|9/11 jihad: Houssein Zorkot, was arraigned in 19th District Court Tuesday on several felony charges, including carrying a dangerous weapon with unlawful ...|
|sweetness-light.com — Man with AK-47 assault rifle arrested after leaving Dearborn’s Hemlock Park DEARBORN - Houssein Zorkot, a 26-year-old Dearborn ...|
[ More results from digg.com ]
|Lebanese medical student Houssein Zorkot was arrested by police near Detroit, Michigan, and found to have a loaded AK-47 assault rifle in his possession. ...|
|3 answers - A 26-year-old Dearborn resident, Houssein Zorkot, was arraigned in 19th District Court Tuesday on several felony charges, including carrying a ...|
|Dr. Houssein Zorkot poses in front of a Hizbollah poster and missiles during a trip to Lebanon in the summer of 2007. Well, it seems we've discovered the ...|
|About 8 miles away from Windsor, Ontario (Canadian home of Hezbollah) 26-year-old Houssein Zorkot was caught in Dearborn, Michigan’s Hemlock Park with an ...|
|In a story that has gotten amazingly little national publicity, a medical student at Wayne State University named Houssein Zorkot was arrested in Dearborn ...|
|Camouflaged Man Armed With AK-47 Arrested In Dearborn Park A 26-year-old Dearborn resident, Houssein Zorkot, was arraigned in 19th District Court Tuesday on ...|
|It turns out that Houssein Zorkot, a 26-year-old Dearborn resident and Wayne State University medical student arrested in a Dearborn park with a loaded ...|
|Houssein Zorkot: Dearbornistan Hezbollah Terror Suspect/Muslim Medical Student.This Shia' Muslim ... more · Michigan Man Caught With AK-47 In Dearborn Park ...|
[ More results from www.freedomszone.com ]
|26-year-old Dearborn resident, Houssein Zorkot, was arraigned in 19th District Court Tuesday on several felony charges, including carrying a dangerous ...|
|The mayor is on guard against any wrong ideas that you might be tempted to get about the appearance and intentions of one, Houssein Zorkot, now being held ...|
|Camouflaged Man Armed With A Loaded AK-47 Arrested In Dearborn Park — A 26-year-old Dearborn resident, Houssein Zorkot, was arraigned in 19th District Court ...|
|A 26-year-old Dearborn resident, Houssein Zorkot, was arraigned in 19th District Court Tuesday on several felony charges, including carrying a dangerous ...|
The original story:
A 26-year-old Dearborn resident, Houssein Zorkot, ...
|The latest is Houssein Zorkot, a third-year medical student at Wayne State University (my father's alma mater). He was caught, Sunday, in Dearbornistan's ...|
|About 8 miles away from Windsor, Ontario (Canadian home of Hezbollah) 26-year-old Houssein Zorkot was caught in Dearborn, Michigan's Hemlock Park with an ...|
|Houssein Zorkot, a 26-year-old Dearborn resident, was arraigned Tuesday in 19th District Court on multiple felony charges, including carrying a dangerous ...|
|... will soon announce that the arrest made by Dearborn police of 26-year-old Dearborn resident Houssein Zorkot at Hemlock Park on Saturday night, ...|
|Labels: houssein zorkot website terror islam lebanon ... Labels: muslim michigan sniper rifle terrorists terror Houssein Zorkot ...|
|Houssein Zorkot: Dearbornistan Hezbollah Terror Suspect/Muslim Medical Student The latest is Houssein Zorkot , a third-year medical student at Wayne State ...|
|Here is the news: 26-year-old Dearborn resident, Houssein Zorkot, was arraigned in 19th District Court Tuesday [...] ...|
|Camouflaged Man Armed With A Loaded AK-47 Arrested In Dearborn Park Â â€”Â A 26-year-old Dearborn resident, Houssein Zorkot, was arraigned in 19th District ...|
|Events underlying the arrest not so comforting: A 26-year-old Dearborn resident, Houssein Zorkot, was arraigned in 19th District Court Tuesday on several ...|
|Houssein Zorkot was caught, Sunday, in Dearbornistan's Hemlock park, armed with an AK-47 assault rifle and dressed in black clothing with camouflage paint ...|
|Houssein Zorkot was arraigned Tuesday before 19th District Judge Mark Somers on two felony charges in the incident at Hemlock Park. ...|
|DEARBORN - Houssein Zorkot (pictured right), a 26-year-old Dearborn resident, was arraigned Tuesday in 19th District Court on multiple felony charges, ...|
|... Houssein Zorkot, was arraigned in 19th District Court Tuesday on several felony charges, including carrying a dangerous weapon with ...|
|Houssein Zorkot, a 26-year-old Islamic, Dearborn resident, was arraigned Tuesday in 19th District Court on multiple felony charges, including carrying a ...|
|His name is Houssein Zorkot and he is (was?) a third year med student at Wayne State University in Detroit. No one has given an explaination as to why the ...|